#Retina 2014 macbook pro pro

We ran 5 cycles of the Standard 1K to 1024K Random test in QuickBench to predict boot volume performance and to simulate an application that executes multiple small random transfers. ( RED means fastest in Megabytes per Second.) ( RED graph bar means FASTEST in Thousands of Samples per Second.)ĪJA System Test measures file level, large sequential storage transfer speed using a 16GB test document that simulates capture and playback of uncompressed HD video with 4096x2160 frame size. We rendered the Sala scene three different ways. ( RED graph bar means FASTEST in Frames Per Second.) We unchecked 'Automatic graphics switching' to force use of the high performance graphics of the GeForce GT 750M. FurMark is called the 'GPU burner.' TessMark measures tessellation processing speed. GPUtest is a collection of OpenGL stress tests for single GPUs. Geekbench 3 - Here is the breakout of the 64-bit multi-core performance ratings for Integer, Floating Point, and Memory ( RED graph bar indicates the fastest SCORE.) ( RED graph bar indicates fastest CB Rating) Some did not.)Ĭinebench R15 - Render 3D Model first with Single Core then with all Cores with Hyper-threading. (* We suspected that some confusing results were the result of thermal throttling so we re-ran the tests with both rMBPs sitting on a laptop cooling stand. (Both were running Mavericks OS X 10.9.4)

#Retina 2014 macbook pro pro

Late 2013 rMBP = 'late 2013' Retina MacBook Pro 2.6GHz Quad Core i7 with GeForce GT 750M GPU, Intel Iris Pro GPU, 16G of RAM, and 512G flash storage Mid 2014 rMBP = 'mid 2014' Retina MacBook Pro 2.8GHz Quad Core i7 with GeForce GT 750M GPU, Intel Iris Pro GPU, 16G of RAM, and 1TB flash storage How does the best 15' Retina MacBook Pro for 2014 compare to the best from 2013? We ran our typical artificial benchmarks to see get a quick answer. Updated Tuesday, August 12th, with 'cooler' results*

Posted Monday, August 11th, 2014 by rob-ART morgan, mad scientist